About Me

Name: Lucky Rock (Jason...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Which GOPer will Hammer Dems for NY Times Military Hit Piece?

Talk radio is all abuzz about the New York Times' latest hit piece on the American military.  The article in question presents stark stories of soldiers who fail to properly adjust to civilian society, at the cost of the lives of others, supposedly revealing a "patchwork picture of a quiet phenomenon, tracing a cross-country trail of death and heartbreak."

However, the gaping hole in the lengthy article is that the Times never compared their tally of returning soldiers' crimes, (largely and dubiously compiled from press coverage of such crimes), with that of the general population.  As Move America Forward has shown, failure to present Iraq veterans' crimes within the context of civilian crime rates, reveals the Grey Lady's pathetic prejudice against our returning heroes.

Of course, this article is absolutely in keeping with the New York Times' previous hit jobs.  But why haven't any of the GOP nominees connected this slap in the face of true patriots with the Grey Lady's ideological partners in crime--Billary, Obama, and Edwards? 

I guarantee that the first Repub candidate to pair the Times' latest smear with the Dems will score some easy points in these final days before the SC primary.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Long Until the U.S. Collapses?

Lo and behold, Patrick J. Buchanan is out with an article I actually agree with.

Our nation is on the road to destruction and, as Buchanan points out, the principle cause is our greed.   The Apostle James' clear warning comes to mind: "Do not be deceived; God cannot be mocked.  A man reaps what he sows." 

Our nation has sown in sub-prime mortgages and runaway credit card debt.  And we will reap in foreclosures, repossessions, and bankruptcies--mere symptoms of our near-complete abandonment of God's principles--financial and otherwise.

So I pose the question to you: how long do we have?  Five years? Ten years? My guess is that within fifteen years, the U.S will be playing second fiddle to China and a still-dominant Middle East oil bloc. 

Predictions?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TownHall Bogus Primary Coverage - Update

On the heels of TownHall's usual schlock praising Romney, Giuliani, and McCain and clobbering Huckabee, yesterday Amanda Carpenter was kind enough to quote George Will bashing Huck once more.  Poor George can't stomach a Republican candidate who hasn't been bought off by Wall Street schlubs intent on continuing their waltz around personal income taxes and importing dangerous slave labor.

In the midst of TownHall's anti-Huck storm, two bright lights shine: Janice Shaw Crouse's dispatch actually praising Huckabee for overcoming anti-evangelical bias in Iowa and Michael Medved's call for Repubs to end the "take everybody down with you" strategy.

Now the question becomes: will TownHall editors and columnists get a clue and stop bashing the folks who clearly meet Reagan's "70% agreement" rule?   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TownHall's Bogus Primary Coverage

Another day, another heaping helping of slanted election coverage from TownHall.com.  The only question in my mind as Townhall.com loads on my computer each day, is how much will they bash Mike Huckabee (previously it was Fred Thompson) and will the Rudy-lovers or the Mitt-lovers pen the most articles today.

On the lib side, the press sings in unison about the rise of Obama.  On TownHall, George Will predicts the demise of Reagan's handiwork courtesy of Mike Huckabee.  Please! 

Medved is right when he calls on conservatives (including TownHall columnists) to stop witchhunting among Republicans.  Rather, GOPers should focus on the best course for our country and why conservative politics is better for all Americans.

On the issue of the Huck, I can't tell you how much sleep I've lost knowing that Wall Street can't stand the guy.  Self-serving, avaricious lowlifes that most of them are, Wall Street "conservatives" rightly see in Huck the long-overdue demise of the fools' bargain social conservatives have been contented with for years. 

Yes, Hillary is for legal baby extermination.  But most of corporate America with a stake in the matter and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are perfectly content with millions of slave laborers, at great cost to our national moral standing and national security. 

Legal snuffing out of innocent life and inhumane & dangerous slave labor should both be unacceptable to true social conservatives and all interested in the lasting security and vitality of our great nation.  By the way, which of these injustices has Reagan's "fusion" stamped out?

It's time to stop clobbering Presidential contenders with whom we mostly agree and to start proclaiming the vastly different realities that will result from either the liberal or conservative agenda.  In the meantime, Huck, take the TownHalliac salvos in stride.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »